In Gods We Trust has ratings and 23 reviews. A cognitive anthropologist and psychologist, Scott Atran argues that religion is a by-product of human. In got trust. Scott Atran In Gods We Trust The Evolutionary Landscape Of Religion (Evolution And Cognition). Topics atheism. Collection. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Atran, Scott, In gods we trust: the evolutionary landscape of religion / Scott Atran. p. cm. — (Evolution .

Author: Majinn Mikazahn
Country: Peru
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 13 July 2006
Pages: 274
PDF File Size: 5.9 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.22 Mb
ISBN: 604-9-55754-943-2
Downloads: 13338
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Arashigore

Contents An Evolutionary Riddle. Atran explains that humans have evolved generally advantageous abilities to recognize that ggods people and animals are agents as opposed to inanimate objects, which helps us to predict what they will do IE a trist might attack us, prey will run away when attacked, a person could be a friend or foe.

The other is deeply racist and isolationist truust is designed to maintain moral integrity among Jews alone. Yet there are odd things like for instance the study which I’m sure would have benefitted greatly from the addition of “a r Once or twice Atran says that he is going to tell us how religion originated, but I cannot fathom what he thinks he has told us.

Mimetics also fails to explain religion due to the general shortcomings of meme theory So why is it here in a book on religion? It is fine and brave to go where angels fear to tread, but he should tread a little more carefully.

Jan 05, Jed Ringel rated it really liked de Shelves: Amazon Music Stream millions of songs.

To purchase, visit your preferred ebook provider. Request removal from index. A cognitive anthropologist and psychologist, Scott Atran argues that religion is a by-product of human evolution just as the cognitive intervention, cultural selection, and historical survival of religion tust an accommodation of certain existential and moral elements that have evolved in the human condition.

In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion – Oxford Scholarship

Anything can grow contentious when taken too literally. Apr 01, Ryan Houlette rated it did not like it Shelves: It stops just as soon as enough sense is made of atram statement to be relevant by providing important new knowledge or rejecting of old knowledge. These things being said, I have one medium and one small complaint about this book. Though he provides a fairly good definition of religion right at the beginning, throughout the rest of the book it is quite unclear where his case studies involve religion and where they involve non-religious culture.


The Dream of Reason: Emotionally powerful, and long-lasing ties among relatively small groups of individuals but hinders wider inferential elaboration and public dissemination of religious theology and cultural ideology.

I’m still interested in the ideas, so I’d love a Cliffnotes version or something.

He could have written a great book. Chefranden rated it really liked it Nov 29, Avoiding the reification of religion allows Atran to rebut competing evolutionary claims as well.

Moral Psychology And Moral Intuition: The Shape of Thought H. Then in next steps he shows how completely wrong it is and how flawed the research behind it really is.

Keith rated it really liked it Jun ae, Writing style is awkward, a little obtuse. Lists with This Book. Wilson also faulted for leaning heavily on work of Kevin MacDonald, a simpatico of Holocaust denier David Irving who actually testified in his defense in Irving’s libel suit.

Remember that experimentally controlled and induced hypoxia can also induce an NDE.

Sometimes one sees lists like these in ‘academic’ writing apologies to dazzling scientist-poets for my blanket statementparticularly when an author is trying very hard to reference only examples of things that have been documented in previous studies and literature, with the misguided intention of making the writing more ‘scholarly’ and anchoring the content to cite-able materials- thus restricting the criteria for inclusion on the list, at the expense of readability and meaningfulness.

It is not like reading something from Dawkins or Sagan. Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon.


Scott Atran In Gods We Trust The Evolutionary Landscape Of Religion ( Evolution And Cognition)

Genes, Genesis, and God: We evolved a visual system to rapidly detect predators and prey, which had to be trip-wired to respond to fragmentary information under conditions of turst. Aug 10, Adam Lewis rated it it was amazing Shelves: Atran covers lots of territor Atran pieces together data from cognitive psychology, anthropology, and other fields to elucidate how evolution lead to religion.

Also faulted for relying in IQ as measuring “intelligence. The Evolution of Morality and Religion. Instead, he suggests that some aspects are byproducts of adaptations while other aspects are plausibly adaptive; “both adaptations and by-products, in turn, have been culturally co opted Consistently while reading this book, I felt like Atran was lifting up religion’s skirt to show us its naked psychological underpinnings.

In any case – this is an excellent though a bit dry book and comes with a warm recommendation.

In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion – Scott Atran – Google Books

For the casual reader i. Rather than adopting an extreme stance on the existence of God or other similar metaphysical persons and concepts or the usefulness of religion for human life and attempting to defend this position through haphazard scholarship and polemic as have perhaps most thinkers who have addressed these issues, Atran adopts an explicitly agnostic stance and instead attempts to explore the relation between human evolution and religion, c Atran offers an innovative and interesting look at religious thought.

He also draws on his own first-hand field work and work in folk biology. In the case of religion, these metarepresentational ideas are never fully assimilated with factual and commonsensical beliefs.