WHAT ARE THE LAWS AGAINST CYBER SQUATTING? Cyber Squatting in India . A complete analysis of cyber squatting and laws. Overview of cybersquatting laws in India and famous cases involving cyber squatters. Case and legal action can be taken against. What is cybersquatting? Cybersquatting or domain-name hijacking refers to the practice of bad faith registration of a domain name under the.

Author: Tunos Meshura
Country: Belize
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 8 May 2017
Pages: 254
PDF File Size: 2.13 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.14 Mb
ISBN: 267-3-87234-851-1
Downloads: 77434
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dashakar

A complaint was brought to WIPO and the Administrative Panel found that the defendant registered the domain name in bad faith. The Court gave its decision in favour of the plaintiff and granted the injunction against the defendants. The court held as domain names are valuable corporate assets, they are entitled to trademark equivalent protection. Cyber squatting is constitutional only if the registration has been done in bad faith, that is, with the intention of selling the domain name at such a higher price to the owner of the trademark, or to create an impression of having some kind of affiliation with the owner of the trademark.

Log into your account. A case with higher complexity may be heard in person. Every domain name is unique.

Simply put, cybersquatters or bad faith imitators register trade-marks, trade names, business names and so on, belonging to third parties with the common motive of trading on the reputation and goodwill of such third parties by either confusing customers or potential customers, and at times, to even sell the domain name to the rightful owner at a profit.

A person may complain before the administration dispute resolution service providers listed by ICANN under Rule 4 a that: How you can make this new year special. Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences. The Court in Case Supra further observed that. Sincethe World Intellectual Property Organization WIPO has provided an arbitration system wherein a trademark holder can attempt to cybersquattng a squatted site.

It is a cheap, fast and easy alternative to complex court procedures and long hours. Subscribe so that you never miss another post! Considering both the domains’ name, it is clear that two names being almost identical or similar in nature, there is every cybersquattng of an Internet user being confused and deceived in believing that both the domain names belong to plaintiff although the two domain names belong to two different concerns”.

  M10 TANK DESTROYER VS STUG III ASSAULT GUN PDF

There are major problems with the question of retrieving the domain names through court. A domain name is easy to remember and use, and is chosen as an instrument of commercial enterprise not only because it facilitates the ability of consumers to navigate the Internet to find nidia they are looking infia, but also at the same time, serves to identify and distinguish the business itself, or its good or services, and to specify cyebrsquatting corresponding online Internet location.

As per the courts, the seat of the trial should be the place of the plaintiff, the defendant or the place of the service provider through which the name is registered. Anti-Cyber Squatting Consumer Protection Act of cybersqustting that a person will be liable for a civil action if.

Another high-profile case involves the Tata Group, a multinational conglomerate. The other famous Yahoo case, the U. Domain name system maps names to a series of number or IP address. Amal Cybbersquatting, a final year engineering student told TOI that he has been doing domain registrations of such sort for quite a while. WIPO [7] proposes that ICANN [8] establish a mechanism to give owners of famous or well-known trademarks exclusive use of their marks in some or all-generic top-level domains throughout a large geographic area.

The domain name is cybeesquatting than a mere Internet address for it also identifies the Internet site to those who reach it.

The numbers referred to above are linked with the domain name “rs. The jurisdiction is always the matter of problem in the case of courts. However, typosquatting is the most popular form of cybersquatting.

The domain name need not change if the computer or service changes, whereas the series kndia numbers will. Section 29 but it also makes provision for what does not amount to infringement see: The court held that even though the domain name was identical or confusing similar to a trademark in which the complainant had rights, the cybersquayting failed to establish that the respondent had no rights or legitimate interest in respect of domain name or that the domain name was registered in bad faith.

However, by registering the most obvious as a domain name e. The cyber squatter then offers cyberwquatting offer the space to the individual or organization that possesses a trademark contained inside the name at an expanded cost. Consequently, a trade mark may have multiple registrations in many countries throughout the world.

  LEATHER CRAFTERS AND SADDLERS JOURNAL PDF

Cyber Squatting Laws In India – Intellectual Property – India

Private defense under IPC. Newsletters may offer personalized content or advertisements. Log into your account. In order to bring the case on a fast track form of resolution, a case could be filed with the registry handled by Undia Internet Exchange of India NiXI.

In Dr Reddy’s Laboratories Limited Vs Manu Kosuri and Anr 58 DRJ Hon’ble High Court indix Delhi Court held that “It is a settled legal position that when a defendant does business under a name which is sufficiently close to the name under which the plaintiff is trading and that name has acquired a reputation the public at large is likely to be misled that the defendant’s business is the business of the plaintiff or is a branch or department of the plaintiff, the defendant is liable for an action in passing off and it is always not necessary that there must be in existence goods of the plaintiff with which the defendant seeks to confuse his own domain name passing off may occur in cases where the plaintiffs do not in fact deal with the offending goods.

Cybersquatting cases: India

Login with your social accounts: Some of the problems that can be immediately identified are:. Private defense under IPC. These cases played a vital role in creating awareness among the trademark holders on the vulnerability of domain names and made them vigilant about these modern day Cyber extortionists or Cybersquatters. Remedy of Passing off: Lastly, providing an option of obtaining Statutory Damages to the plaintiff will act as an important tool for trademark holders in protecting their Intellectual Property online.

Disputes over rights to domain names, which serve as a source — identifying function in cyberspace, similar to a trademark, arise at the heart of this intersection between international trademark law and the Internet1. A person may complain before the administration dispute resolution service providers listed by ICANN under Rule 4 a that:. Footnotes 1 Lawyers introduction to the internet, by Andrew Terrett, Masons also at http: In India, the Information Technology Act contains no provisions to punish cyber-squatters.

Not So Fine, Snofinn!! There is a specific registration process involved.