De Bondt, W. F. M., & Thaler, R. H. (). Does the stock market overreact. Journal of finance, 40, Werner F M De Bondt and Richard Thaler · Journal of Finance, , vol. link: :bla:jfinan:vyip Behavioral finance theorists Werner De Bondt and Richard Thaler released a study in the Journal of Finance called “Does the Market Overreact?” In their .
| Author: | Dujinn Kigabei |
| Country: | Belgium |
| Language: | English (Spanish) |
| Genre: | Business |
| Published (Last): | 20 May 2004 |
| Pages: | 316 |
| PDF File Size: | 7.44 Mb |
| ePub File Size: | 2.34 Mb |
| ISBN: | 126-9-96450-217-2 |
| Downloads: | 41957 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
| Uploader: | Shataur |
Since, for any period t, the same constant market return Rlmt subtracted from all Rjt’s, the results are interpretablein terms of is raw dollar returns.
Richard Thaler – Google Scholar Citations
Specifically, two hypotheses are suggested: People seem to make predictions according to a simple matching rule: Shiller concludes that, at least over the last century, dividends simply do not vary enough to rationally justify observedaggregateprice movements. Thus, the loser portfolios not only outperformthe winnerportfolios;if the CAPM is correct, they are also significantly less risky. The New Contrarian Investment Febondt. The requirementthat 85 subsequent returns are available before any firm is allowed in the sample biases the selection towards large, established firms.
Finally, the choice of December as the “portfolio formation month” and, therefore, of January as the “starting month” is essentially arbitrary. Thus, if many investorschoose to wait 9185 than six months before realizinglosses, the portfolio of small firms may still contain many “losers. Of course, unless these omitted factors can be identified, tthaler hypothesis is untestable.
EconPapers: Does the Stock Market Overreact?
Thus, whenevera stock dropsout, the calculations involve an implicit rebalancing. Stock and the Futures More recently, Arrowhas concludedthat the work of Kahneman and Tversky “typifies very precisely the exessive reaction to current information which seems to characterize all the securities and futures markets” [1, p. Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency R Thaler Economics letters 8 3, The question then arises whether such behavior ddbondt at the market level.
However, several aspects of the results remain without adequateexplanation. The term overreaction carries with it an implicit comparison to some degree of reaction that is consideredto be appropriate. The decision to study the CAR’s for a period of 36 months after the portfolio formation date reflects a compromise between statistical and economic considerations, namely, an adequatenumberof independent replications versus a time period long enough to study issues relevant to asset pricing theory.
Does the Stock Market Overreact?
Title Cited by Year Nudge: While the overreactionhypothesis has considerablea priori appeal,the obvious question to ask is: The effect of multiplying the numberof replications is to remove part of the random noise.
How does the anomaly survive the process of arbitrage?
And in again,in the third and fourthJanuaries? The excess volatility issue has been investigated most thoroughly by Shiller [27]. Thaer order to judge whether, for any month t, the average residual return makes a contribution to either A CAR or Debonft, we thalrr test whether it w,t is significantly different from zero.
We will now describe the basic research design used to form the winner and loser portfolios and the statistical test proceduresthat determine which of the two competing hypotheses receives more support from the data. Mental accounting and consumer choice R Thaler Marketing science 4 3, The choice of the data base, the CRSP Monthly Return File, is in part justified by 4Since this study concentrateson companiesthat experienceextraordinary returns,either positive or negative, there may be some concern that their attrition rate sufficiently deviates from the “normal” so as to cause a survivorship rate bias.
Secondly,if prices “rebound” January, 195 is that effect so much larger in magnitude than the selling pressure that “caused”it during the final months of the previous year? As time goes on and new securities appear on the tape, more and more stocks qualify for this step.
De Bondt and Richard Thaler Source: For every stockj on the tape with at least 85 months of returndata months 1 through 85without any missing values in between, and starting in January month 49the next 72 monthly residualreturns ujt months 49 through are estimated.
Once future earnings turn out to be better than the unreasonablygloomy forecasts, the price adjusts. From a different viewpoint, therefore, the results in Table I are likely to underestimate both the true magnitudeand statistical significance of the overreactioneffect.
What is an appropriatereaction? Ohlson and Penman [20] have further suggestedthat the increasedvolatility of security returns following stock splits may also be linked to overreaction. Journal of Behavioral decision making 12 3, But, if the effect under study can be shown to apply to them, the results are, if anything, more interesting.
What will happen if the equilibriummodel is misspecified? New citations to this author. Journal of Economic perspectives 5 1, To reiterate, thhaler previous findings are broadlyconsistent with the predictions of the overreactionhypothesis. However, the companies in the extreme portfolios do not systematically differ with respect to market capitalization.
Overreaction
Most financial economists seem to regardthe anomaly as a statistical artifact. In other words, “winner” W and “loser” portfolios L are formed conditional upon past excess returns, rather than some firm-generatedinformationalvariable such as earnings.
Therefore,no statistical tests are performed. Implicationsfor OtherEmpirical Work The results of this study have interesting implications for previous work on the small firm effect, the January effect and the dividend yield and PIE effects. With respect to the PIE effect, our results support the price-ratio hypothesis whereas low discussed in the introduction,i.