1 star because I can’t give it 0. Germar Rudolf: bigot, racist and holocaust denier. German Holocaust Denier Imprisoned for Inciting Racial Hatred: A German. Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of ‘Truth’ and ‘Memory’. At the start of his trial in November, Germar Rudolf had called the Holocaust ‘a. Germar Rudolf, also known as Germar Scheerer, born 29 October , is a German chemist Rudolf knew his work would be associated with Holocaust denial, but insisted that even Remer had a right to legal defense. ), ISBN ; Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory.

Author: Yoshakar Nikozuru
Country: Iran
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 11 April 2013
Pages: 102
PDF File Size: 15.41 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.11 Mb
ISBN: 730-5-66016-298-3
Downloads: 42350
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kazikinos

Germar Rudolf

The fact that to this day no one sees fit to gather this evidence, which the Soviet anti-Fascist propaganda of the past holocausf would not have been the only one to jump at, makes me wonder, to put it mildly; all the more so because nowadays, expert reports on technical matters are required for even the most routine court case following, say, a car accident, never mind for murder trials, where a single life was lost!

Under these conditions it is especially important to view eyewitness testimony in a critical light, for it is to be expected that testimony which holocaustt a crime or a set of crimes will be rejected rrudolf worthless without any reason for such rejection, while incriminating testimony is indiscriminately accepted as truth.

He presents an extensive critique of eyewitness testimony and media representation of the alleged mass execution of Jews from Kyiv by German task forces in the valley of Babi Yar in autumn of In denying the holocaut of the Jews, he denies the Federal Republic’s legitimacy. While the greater part of the revisionist research presented here was generally aimed to attack and refute establishment notions – to be destructive, as it were – its future focus will no doubt shift to constructive research, i.

Dissecting the Holocaust: Ernst Gauss: The Controversy about the Extermination of the Jews

It is very likely that the aim of all these backstage arrangements was to ensure that I would not make even more trouble for standard historiography[39] a plan that did, however, fail completely.

Margaret marked it as to-read Feb 16, But this is not the only contentious issue in which the media deny the truth for ideological reasons. The Mazal Holocaust Collection teh a large number of books and pamphlets by authors te the Holocaust.

Anyone who tries to make the legitimacy of the Federal Republic of Germany’s existence hinge on the truth or falsehood of historiography about a detail of contemporary history and almost all the major media and many politicians have been doing this latelysuffers from a profound misconception of the foundations of this Republic, which is not based on the Holocaust but on the agreement of its citizens and on inalienable human and national rights.

It is admittedly subjective in its approach, but in light of the enormous preponderance of no less subjective portrayals by judges and prosecutors it is no more than a necessary corrective to be welcomed in a pluralistic society. Return to Book Fermar.


The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung correctly called it ” terrorism of conviction ” in the Federal capital. Breadcrumb Home Dissecting the Holocaust: This point of utmost significance was recently raised by this author, [] but as is the norm in matters of factual revisionist questions, the opposing side completely ignored this point in their reply.

Francesco rated it it was amazing Mar 11, Conservative or right-wing publications could not counterbalance the economic advantages held in by the media that had been established in or shortly thereafter. Scholarship serves a cause, the cause of Truth. Many historians are more interested in preserving the politically correct image of this period of history rather than in supporting impartial research.

We hereby introduce our theses regarding subsections of the Holocaust and look forward to objective replies and possibly refutations. Few people know, for instance, that the dispute regarding the existence of the gas chamber at Dachau [] could be resolved easily enough if someone mustered up the courage to use an induction locator to find the water pipes in the ceiling of the alleged gas chamber which to this day could supply the showerheads installed in the ceiling with hot water if the water boiler was once again activated.

It is the key function and responsibility of every branch of science to provide accurate figures and values. Viewed in this way, historical revisionism is a weapon against abusive political power.

Aside from these construction engineering reports, studies in the fields of toxicology, chemical engineering and machine dynamics are required to determine which poison gas would have brought about which results through which methods and under which circumstances, whether the scenarios of mass murder attested to were technically even possible, and whether there ought to be evidence surviving to the present.

Nor does it try to describe, in detail or in brief, how certain events happened, as do most history books. In the German Bundestag parliament this view is expressed and confirmed with applause from all! If the media, the politicians, and even many jurists have their way, the subjective aspects are now also supposed to be settled beforehand! Also ask your local book store to order it for you. In his chapter, Arnulf Neumaier considers problems diissecting construction engineering associated with the alleged gas chambers of Treblinka, and particularly the issues of whether the methods which witnesses claim were used to destroy the evidence – in this instance, the complete incineration of almost one million people – were at all technically possible, what sorts of evidence one ought nevertheless to expect, and how these conclusions compare with the evidence that has in fact been found.

However, Richard Green and Jamie Dudolf from The Holocaust History Project have criticized the report, saying that like Fred Leuchter in the Leuchter reportRudolf did not discriminate against rhdolf formation of iron-based cyanide compounds, which are not a reliable indicator of the presence of cyanide, so that his experiment was seriously flawed.

German lawyers offer similar arguments: Already we are confronted with the next objection: While one’s reply to the question ‘are you anti-Communist? These associations are as a rule provided by accompanying text and commentary which, however, tend not to stand up to closer scrutiny. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. The court decided germqr the educational status of the witness as Diplom-Chemiker academically accredited chemist was insufficient to allow him to give expert testimony on questions relating to dissectting.


Germar Rudolf – Wikipedia

First steps towards a resolution of engineering and architectural questions regarding this complex are currently being taken by two groups of revisionist holocausr, relying mainly upon the vast archival resources of several eastern European cities like Moscow, Prague, and Warsaw.

But this is the core of our statistical investigation.

Reconciliation can progress only in a climate which fosters speaking from the heart and listening with an open mind and spirit; where opinions are expressed rather than choked back or even suppressed; where points of contention are discussed in a civilized manner and not hidden by hushing-up, distractionism, or violence.

David Cole Interviews Dr. Historians should take general warning from the fact that the Allies and their accessories found every conceivable means for forgery at their disposal after the war – original letterhead stationery, typewriters, rubber stamps, printing presses etc. We firmly believe, therefore, that the aerial photographs taken by German as well as by Allied reconnaissance planes during World War II, which in part still reside untouched in the archives today, are a source of reliable insight into the events of those days, and further, that air photos taken today would still allow scientists to determine the size of former mass graves, or even the foundations of buildings no longer extant.

Why should the eyewitness testimony and reports about camps of the East, which have been locked away behind the Iron Curtain for decades, be any more trustworthy than those reports about western camps which would then have been exposed as false statements or downright lies? Doubtless it is correct that even one is one too many, and really one must go even farther than that: To date, in its trials of the so-called National Socialist mass murders of Jews, the Federal German justice system – and others as well – has concerned itself merely with convicting individual accused persons of sole or joint guilt.

So, what is such a state to do when it turns out that the Revisionists really are right? But since it is too early to come to any final conclusions, we have decided to include only two selected topics combined in a single article in this handbook. Radnitzky exposes the methods with which this manipulative, mendacious and falsifying elite uses media campaigns to bring about the downfall of persons holding dissenting opinions, and how this elite does not even balk at using or at least tolerating violence, for example in the form of assassination and arson of insignificant right-wing politicians or publications.