Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. Hindman, Matthew Scott, The myth of digital democracy / Matthew Hindman. p. cm. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Matthew Hindman . From law to public policy, democratic theory to party politics, interest in the Internet has begun from the. The Myth of Digital Democracy has 73 ratings and 11 reviews. Maru said: Mentioned in this excellent article in the NYT on the influence of the internet o.
|Published (Last):||17 March 2008|
|PDF File Size:||17.29 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.72 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
He found that it does not. I actually finished Matt’s book a while back, but I wanted to note that it deomcracy challenges the conventional wisdom on how the Internet has changed communications and democracy.
The Myth of Digital Democracy by Matthew Hindman
demodracy So the specific claim here is that the Internet is increasing the volume of citizens talking to each other — which is a vital democratic activity particularly if they are talking to the people they disagree with. This second definition of democratization presumes first and foremost that the technology dempcracy amplify the political voice demmocracy ordinary citizens.
Mauricio Santoro rated it liked it Dec 18, Nov 16, Jeremy rated it really liked it. In these accounts, the Internet is redistributing political influence; it is broadening the public sphere, increasing political participation, involving citizens in political activities that were previously closed to them, and challenging the monopoly of traditional elites.
We are not born and raised online should I add: Unwillingness to stick head up above parapet? However the myth busting starts here with the thought that:.
Is the Internet democratizing American politics? Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Kent Jennings and Vicki Zeitner found that Internet use had little effect on civic engagement. The Myth of Digital Democracy reveals that, contrary to popular belief, the Internet has done little to broaden political discourse but in fact empowers a small set of elites–some new, but most familiar.
Be the first to ask a question about The Myth of Digital Democracy.
Hindman is looking to examine this underpinning belief that the internet is of necessity a democratising force in the world. All else being equal, sites with more links should receive more traffic. The online public sphere is already a de facto aristocracy dominated by those skilled in the high deliberative arts. In Voice and Equality, for example, Verba, Schlozman, and Brady argue that differences in political resources result in a systematic distortion in the perceived preferences of the public, and that this distortion favors traditionally privileged groups and those with conservative views.
The Internet’s successes at democratizing politics are real. Return to Book Page. That being said, Hindman convincingly shows that the blogosphere is at least as “winner-take-all” as traditional media, and that the people who are running new media properties are as white, male, and well-educated as their traditional media counterparts.
This book was a significant paradigm shift for me. Hindman, in The Myth of Digital Democracydoes not have to dig deep to cut down this myth: However, I also see some more subtle changes, not so much for the better. Carter rated it really liked it Jan 19, Mike rated it really liked it Aug 14, Second, Googlearchy indicates that niche dominance should be a general rule of online life.
That being said, Hindman convincingly shows that the blogosphere is at least as “winner-take-all” as traditional media, and that the people who are running new media properties are as white, male, and well-educated as their traditi A nice book about Hindman’s research into whether digital media is promoting democracy. His concept of the political is rather narrow, and could be expanded to include blogs and other media that provide critical commentary on social issues but do cover such traditional poli sci topics as governance, elections etc.
Aeden rated it really liked it Nov 20, Internet edmocracy increased political knowledge among citizens hineman interested in politics, but had the opposite effect among the previously apathetic.
The problem, perhaps, lies in the association of speed with progress, in the idea of technological progress as a catalyst for societal progress. He finds that while the Internet has increased some forms of political participation and transformed the way interest groups and candidates organize, mobilize, and raise funds, elites still strongly shape how political material on the Web is presented and accessed.
I was particularly struck by the point you highlight — who ymth that blogs are a tool for democratic participation? I am a tye gadget thd but was hesitating about the Kindle as I am hoping Father Christmas brings me an iPad and having both seemed profligate even for the most techno lust driven individual.
The Myth of Digital Democracy
However its extremely useful to look at his analysis in terms of the digital divide and where new forms of activisim are rubbing up against the old elites: Dec 02, Maria Paula Lorgia rated it liked it. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. He goes on to talk about muth fact that this belief is also connected to an evolution of our democracy from a representative to a deliberative one. We were all whipped into a frenzy of smaller, faster, more productive. At least three of the ten bloggers-Marshall, Reynolds, and Drum-are the children of academics.
Since it shifts power from the people to the best deliberators among them, deliberative democracy… appears to be in effect an aristocracy of intellectuals. Princeton University Press- Computers – pages.
People online tend to be more rude and less emphatic in their communications, because they forget that they are not talking to a machine but to another human being. Giovanna Michelato rated it liked it Oct 03, Nathalie rated it liked it Jan 07, Tanvi Sood rated it liked it Jan 15, Third, Googlearchy suggests that this dependence on links should make niche dominance self-perpetuating.
I am researcher trying to figure out if all this web 2. The Internet is a winner-takes-all place where only the top influencers are heard and everyone else is a tree falling in a forest?
He shows how, despite the wealth of independent Web sites, online news audiences are concentrated on the top twenty outlets, and online organizing and fund-raising are dominated by a few powerful interest groups. Plus the Internet can increase less participative enablers for democracy like transparency….
Much of Matt’s data includes news and media site traffic, and the patterns that Matt found in the concentration of Internet traffic around elite sites and the phenomenon of the “missing middle” seem to be rather universal anyway. A much-needed empirical study of many aspects of the Net’s effect on U. Your email address will not be published. James rated it liked it Aug 06,