REPORT. ISO/TR. First edition. Reference number . This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC. (International Standard Risk Management ISO Draft Review) ISO , the international standard for Risk Management – ‘Risk Management. Hi:bigwave: Does anybody have a copy of the draft working document ISO they could share with little me? ttfn Ben.
|Published (Last):||14 July 2012|
|PDF File Size:||19.38 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.53 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Internet of Things What does it mean? The major task to accomplish is progress the revision of ISO Please do review and pass on your thoughts and opinions by clicking the box below. However, more complex language has been edited and reduced and accordingly the revised text is shorter and more precise and hopefully the user will find it much simpler to read.
The result was that it was agreed that there was a need to reduce the text quite a lot but that an appropriate balance between giving guidance with enough details and not turning the guidance offered draaft a school text book. Our main challenge was to find a fair and sensible balance between supplementing the chapter with necessary concepts and not losing sight of all other users.
Comparing ISO () with the draft ISO () – Part 2 –
The message TC would like to pass on to the reader of the DIS is to critically assess if the current draft provides the required guidance while still remaining relevant to all organizations, in all countries.
The draft of the standard for review and comment is now available on the BSI Draft Review system at https: The content between brackets should be left out.
More interpretations are possible, more definitions come into play and more options in the use of the standard are provided e. In the committee commenting stages there was a strong desire to address the proliferation of terms, that could impair the ease of access to the standard or add to confusion across sectors for many users. The one remark I have is the note 1 on the definition of risk. The clauses on process has probably been the area that has received most comments during the revision.
The final DIS text has not dramatically changed the version and all steps in the process have been kept. Before being sent to ISO the draft of the DIS was endorsed by the working group WG2 and reviewed by an editorial team who checked for typographic issues and consistency across the different sections.
Don’t be the weak link. From the comments made by the contributing experts it was clear that Annex A should be removed and instead the topic dealt with separately through a New Work item proposal to address risk management maturity. Hosting services provided by: It should be noted that there was some convergence, from initially very different positions, from members of the technical committee, and in some cases National Mirror Committees, towards a shared vision of best practice in global risk management.
The next steps of the revision process are translation into French followed by comments and ballots from the National Standardization Bodies. The intention is to promote harmonization within ISO documents with respect to risk and its management.
Comparing ISO 31000 (2009) with the draft ISO 31000 (2017) – Part 2
This DIS is at an extremely important stage and we recommend that you review it very carefully in the context and wider activities of your organisation. The intention throughout the revision process in recent meetings has been to focus on the fundamentals and in doing so create a shorter, clearer and more concise document that is easier to read and apply.
This is a new section iao the standard.
The strengthened generic nature of the standard can hopefully provide for confidence between experts and end users who each have specific problems in risk but need to understand and communicate with others stakeholders. As this sentence was followed by 29 definitions isoo fully defined risk management the ISO way. The major change in this section at least to me is the fact that the following sentence has changed.
Care needed to be taken in in considering all the points raised and discussions on the right way forward took considerable time. However, pursuing opportunities without managing threats and weaknesses and not building on strengths, can certainly bring about unexpected and unwanted consequences. Below some of the changes to the version of ISO have been summarised and a few words on why the changes are being proposed:. The decision to review ISO was taken at in Chicago in and now, 4 years later, a draft version of the proposed updates to the ISO document is available for users to see.
It can be positive sometimes expressed as opportunitiesnegative sometimes expressed as threats or both.
Revision of ISO 31000 Risk Management Guidelines – Draft available
Ultimately the decision was made to simplify the text and use other documents, such as ISO Guide 73 to provide additional information to those that need it. The overall message of ISO stays the same that the risk management process is an integrated part of strategic and operational management. The vision was to phrase a framework clause that provides guidance that is relevant for every possible user of the standard.
The consequences are then the effects of uncertainty on the objectives related to the opportunity pursued. It can be positive, negative or both. Although effects can also become risk sources, the way note 1 is phrased only leads to a short sighted view on isi can be understood by effects.
Because in my opinion, opportunities and threats are external risk sources in the same way as weaknesses and strengths are internal risk sources.
There was considerable discussion on fundamental issues on the role of standards. We can expect that the new version of ISO will be published at the end of or early in The most recent meeting in Jordan provided the impetus and key changes necessary to move the standard forward and out of its committee stages making it available for wider comment. The next ISO meeting is being held in San Francisco in July and this suggests publication of the revised risk management standard perhaps early in The Working Group meets craft time on July 10th — 14th, in San Francisco to work on finalizing the revision.
The problem I have with this sentence is the parts between brackets.