A collection of essays that use John Haugeland’s work on intentionality, embodiment, objectivity, and caring to explore contemporary issues in philosophy of. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea [John Haugeland] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Machines who thinkâhow utterly preposterous. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea by John Haugeland () Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind by John Haugeland (
| Author: | Zulkiran Tell |
| Country: | Iran |
| Language: | English (Spanish) |
| Genre: | Relationship |
| Published (Last): | 7 July 2018 |
| Pages: | 203 |
| PDF File Size: | 12.12 Mb |
| ePub File Size: | 19.45 Mb |
| ISBN: | 482-2-11331-552-7 |
| Downloads: | 69991 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
| Uploader: | Zusho |
He argues that, while the paradigm of scientific hzugeland is explanation as a cognitive process, understanding is something different, something not able jonh be analyzed in terms of the normal components of cognitive states.
On her view, there is no longer a puzzle about how representations expressed in language can refer to objects in the world. East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion. Ultimately, then, McDowell suggests that we consider the view Haugeland is advocating not as a “postrationalist epistemology,” but instead as an “improved rationalism, free of the dogma of cognitivism but still characterized by a version of positivism” He spent most of his career teaching at the University of Pittsburgh and he also served as a visiting professor at Helsinki UniversityFinland.
John Haugeland, Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea – PhilPapers
For me, as someone mostly familiar with Haugeland’s work on Heidegger, the introduction made it clear even when not mentioning Heidegger explicitly how Heideggerian resonances were present in Haugeland’s work in other areas, allowing me to both better appreciate what Haugeland and the jphn essays were doing.
There’s a problem loading this menu right now.
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Now, I do think that both of these forms of variety are strengths, but they also serve to make this collection jhn challenging read. This openness to changing one’s view in response to things encountered in the world is critical to Haugeland’s concept of ontological responsibility — actually being faithful to entities as encountered.
At Berkeley, Hubert Dreyfus served as one of his important mentors. Retrieved from ” https: Discourse is not about expressing representations at all, but is rather a way of pointing the listener to something in the world that “may already have been available and uncovered, in the sense that our shared public interpretation gives it salience and significance” As we have already seen in Crowell’s essay, this is an important moment for Haugeland.
dblp: John Haugeland
In addition to the variety of philosophical sources from which the articles draw, there are also quite a few different philosophical sub-disciplines represented, such as philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, metaphysics, epistemology, and haugsland of science. Are Minimal Representations Still Representations? McDowell finds Haugeland’s accusation of cognitivism something of a straw man.
So, it seems that understanding is the recognition of the necessary law itself emerging out of the empirical data, while explanation is being able to take a given set of data and show how it occurs in accordance with the necessary laws.
He uaugeland featured in Tao Ruspoli ‘s film Being in the World.
Other animals might very well desire things encountered in the environment that they perceive as beneficial for them. He states that a “skilled scientific investigator knows that one can acquire knowledge and understanding of worldly phenomena by following such and such investigative procedures” emphasis added, Sixteen Years of Artificial Intelligence: Death, for Haugeland, is the “collapse of an understanding of being,” i.
Before attending haugeand school Haugeland served as a Peace Corps volunteer in Tonga. Provide feedback about this page. Rouse starts with Haugeland’s claim that “love is the mark of the human”as opposed to the traditional idea that it is our enhanced capacity for reason that separates us from other animals.
This know-how cannot itself be reduced to propositional form. This synopsis leaves the reader well situated to better understand both Haugeland himself and the essays by the contributors. Insofar as they do, they exhibit what Rouse calls a “narcissistic intentionality” In the final chapter in this section, John Kulvicki attempts to work out an ontology of recordings.
This is the connection, then, between death and love. Next, Haugeland considers joohn laws, defining them as “necessary facts,” establishing an important connection to modal logic That is, “we use philosophical discourse to direct one another’s attention to how things are” That is, he raises questions about what recordings e.
Similar authors to follow
Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Due to considerations of length, I have decided to take primarily a descriptive approach in this review, foregoing more fine-grained evaluation and analysis of the nuances of the articles.
Andrew beedle – – Philosophical Psychology 11 2: English Choose a language for shopping. Macbeth suggests that we find a middle ground between these positions that recognizes human and animal existence as forming an irreducible unity with the world.