Existentialism From Dostoevsky to Sartre [Walter Kaufmann] on * FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Good for age. Wear and creasing of spine. Mar 1, One of the foremost resources on existentialism from renowned philosopher, poet , and Nietzsche translator Walter Kaufmann—a must-read for. Mar 28, One of the foremost resources on existentialism from renowned philosopher, poet , and Nietzsche translator Walter Kaufmann—a must-read for.
| Author: | Vudojar Zulurisar |
| Country: | Brunei Darussalam |
| Language: | English (Spanish) |
| Genre: | Love |
| Published (Last): | 20 March 2010 |
| Pages: | 350 |
| PDF File Size: | 15.46 Mb |
| ePub File Size: | 7.96 Mb |
| ISBN: | 331-6-44191-606-9 |
| Downloads: | 48310 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
| Uploader: | Vimuro |
I have always considered myself cleverer than any of the people surrounding me, and sometimes, would you believe it, have been positively ashamed of it. Does our story have a moral? From Ecce Homo Five: Book ratings by Goodreads. See all 56 reviews. Who does live beyond forty? His partisans occasionally counter criticisms saying that they presuppose the competence of common sense or logic, and their voices show the scorn with which a critic of Picasso might be told that he is a mere Philistine.
And all of them contrast inauthentic life and authentic life. Found this book on a bookshelf in high school. I was lying from spite. Plato had maintained on the whole that in the things that matter most reason is competent, while in Christianity the position gained adherents that those questions which our reason can decide are eo ipso not of ultimate importance while the most crucial statements must be above rational scrutiny.
How much better it is to understand it all, to recognize it all, all the impossibilities and the stone wall; not to be reconciled to one of those impossibilities and stone walls if it disgusts you to be reconciled to it; by the way of the most inevitable, logical combinations to reach the most revolting conclusions on the everlasting theme, that even for the stone wall you are yourself somehow to blame, though again it is as clear as day you are not to blame in the least, and therefore grinding your teeth in silent impotence to sink into luxurious inertia, brooding on the fact that there is no one even for you to feel vindictive against, that you have not, and perhaps never will have, an object for your spite, that it is a sleight of hand, a bit of juggling, a card-sharper’s trick, that it is simply a mess, no knowing what and no knowing who, but in spite of all these uncertainties and jugglings, still there is an ache in you, and the more you do not know, the worse the ache.
Dangerous, as this is presented to be a primer of the most fundamental sort. Authenticity Authenticity is acting in complete freedom.
Existentialism is a timeless sensibility that can be discerned here and there in the past; existemtialism it is only in recent times that it has hardened into a sustained protest and preoccupation. Here he uses the terms existentia and essentia in the old sense of metaphysics which says since Plato: Nietzsche’s wit, his praise of laughter, and his sparkling prose, now limpid, now like granite, could scarcely be more unlike the vast and solemn tomes of Jaspers or the twilight style of Heidegger.
English Choose a language for shopping. Mar 01, Pages. Those people don’t actually understand the concepts. Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime. If this last question, however, were asked not in a spirit of sarcasm but with a genuine perplexity about the value of all such endeavors, Jaspers would not only admit that “its yield for the knowledge of psychic life remains small after all”; he would even say that this is one of his central points.
One of the favorite pastimes of German professors and students: II I want now to tell you, gentlemen, whether you care to hear it or not, why I dostoevsk not even become an insect. Jaspers’ attitude, and indeed that of the other existentialists, too, toward one science in particular deserves special attention: The three writers kaufmanb appear invariably on every list of “existentialists”—Jaspers, Heidegger, and Sartre—are not in agreement on essentials.
Unfortunately, most readers fail to distinguish between Dostoevsky’s views and those of the Grand Inquisitor in Ivan’s story in The Brothers Karamazov, though it is patent that this figure was inspired by the author’s hatred of the Church of Rome; and many critics take for Dostoevsky’s reasoned judgments the strange views of Kirilov, though he is mad.
He was a psychiatrist-turned-philosopher who was forced from his teaching position during the Nazi takeover for marrying a Jewish woman. It is similar when we turn to L’etre et le neant.
Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre: Walter Kaufmann: : Books
I stick to that. Therefore, it is well to keep in mind that perhaps the most compassionate and venerable of all mortals, the Buddha, also made a point of his lack of belief, and for essentially the same reason as Sartre.
Kaufmann doesn’t really answer what existentialism and doesn’t manage to create a narrative that shows how these writings created the backbone of the philosophy. Even as modern prose and painting are no longer satisfied with the representation of events or things, Heidegger feels that the time has come for philosophy to break with what he calls representational thinking.
Having read Sartre, we understand Jaspers and Heidegger better: When he died inhe was a national hero. Unlike Heidegger inSartre derives no advantage from it whatsoever. I should persecute any one who would not show me respect.
Even so, some who know their Kant are awed by the erudition of his classical interpretations; Nietzsche scholars find his Rilke essay stimulating and profound; and Rilke scholars bow before his Nietzsche exegesis. But really Sartre was a kind of anti-Heidegger, in the same way that Nietzsche was the anti-Kierkegaard.
In both cases the late philosophy has esoteric, dartre not mystic, touches and is supported by the most tremendous sense of a historic mission. No, I refuse to consult a doctor from spite. As for Heidegger’s later writings, Jaspers has long stopped as much as reading them.
Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre
Sartre and Camus made me feel that ultimately, my time was well spent. The longest selection of Jaspers does a good job of kaufann the similarities between Nietsche and Kierkegaard which are beyond their vast differences, and despite there being no possibility that either knew of the other’s work.
The self is essentially intangible and must be understood in terms of possibilities, dread, and decisions.